Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 2014, 50(4): 581-602 | DOI: 10.13060/00380288.2014.50.4.109

Changing Approaches to the Conceptualisation of Rural Space in Rural Studies

Vladan Hruška
Univerzita Jana Evangelisty Purkyně v Ústí nad Labem

The article focuses on various approaches to conceptualising rural space within the evolution of (in particular British) rural studies. The overview starts with the functional definitions (descriptive and socio-cultural) typical for the positivist and modern period of rural studies. Descriptive and sociocultural definitions derive from the rural-urban dichotomy or continuum, and the rural space is defined in relation to cities as non-urban space. Since the 1980s the political-economic approach has significantly influenced rural studies, transformed them into a more critical science, and introduced a definition of the rural as a locality. This definition, however, only became accepted when it was combined with a definition of the rural as social representation. That definition is a product of the cultural turn in rural studies that has occurred since the 1990s, when post-modern and post-structural approaches penetrated rural studies and promoted fruitful scholarly discussion that then positioned rural geography firmly among other geographical sub-disciplines. Current hybrid approaches to the conceptualisation of rural space combine both material and ideational definitions of the rural and include also rural practices, through which the material and the ideational rural are interlinked.

Keywords: rural space, definition, rural studies

Published: August 1, 2014  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Hruška, V. (2014). Changing Approaches to the Conceptualisation of Rural Space in Rural Studies. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review50(4), 581-602. doi: 10.13060/00380288.2014.50.4.109
Download citation

References

  1. Bell, D. 2006. "Variations on the Rural Idyll." Pp. 149-160 in P. Cloke, P. Marsden, P. Mooney (eds.). Handbook of Rural Studies. London: SAGE, http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781848608016.n10. Go to original source...
  2. Bell, M. 2007. "The Two-ness of Rural Life and the Ends of Rural Scholarship." Journal of Rural Studies 23: 402-415, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2007.03.003. Go to original source...
  3. Blažek, B. 1998. Venkov, města, média. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství (SLON).
  4. Carolan, M. 2008. "More-than-representational Knowledge/s of the Countryside: How We Think as Bodies." Sociologia Ruralis 48: 408-421, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2008.00458.x. Go to original source...
  5. Cloke, P. 1977. "An Index of Rurality for England and Wales." Regional Studies 11: 31-46, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09595237700185041. Go to original source...
  6. Cloke, P. 1996. "Rural Life-Styles: Material Opportunity, Cultural Experience, and How Theory Can Undermine Policy." Economic Geography 72: 433-449, http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/144523. Go to original source...
  7. Cloke, P. 1997. "Country Backwater to Virtual Village? Rural Studies and 'The Cultural Turn'." Journal of Rural Studies 13: 367-375, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0743-0167(97)00053-3. Go to original source...
  8. Cloke, P. 2006. "Conceptualizing Rurality." Pp. 18-28 in P. Cloke, P. Marsden, P. Mooney (eds.). Handbook of Rural Studies. London: SAGE, http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781848608016.n2. Go to original source...
  9. Cloke, P., G. Edwards. 1986. "Rurality in England and Wales 1981: A Replication of the 1971 Index." Regional Studies 20: 289-306, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09595238600185271. Go to original source...
  10. Cloke, P., M. Goodwin. 1992. "Conceptualizing Countryside Change: From Post-fordism to Rural Structured Coherence." Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 17: 321-336, http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/622883. Go to original source...
  11. van Dam, F., S. Heins, B. Elbersen. 2002. "Lay Discourses of the Rural and Stated and Revealed Preferences for Rural Living. Some Evidence of the Existence of a Rural Idyll in the Netherlands." Journal of Rural Studies 18: 461-476, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0743-0167(02)00035-9. Go to original source...
  12. Edensor, T. 2006. "Performing Rurality." Pp. 484-495 in P. Cloke, P. Marsden, P. Mooney (eds.). Handbook of Rural Studies. London: SAGE, http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781848608016.n35. Go to original source...
  13. Elden, S. 2009. "Space I." Pp. 262-267 in R. Kitchin, N. Thrift (eds.). International Encyclopedia of Human Geography. Amsterdam: Elsevier, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-008044910-4.00320-5. Go to original source...
  14. Evans, N. 2008. "Rural Geography: Processes, Responses and Experiences in Rural Restructuring (Book Review)." Global Built Environment Review 6 (3): 63-65.
  15. Gilbert, J. 1982. "Rural Theory: The Grounding of Rural Sociology." Rural Sociology 47: 609-633.
  16. Gray, J. 2000. "The Common Agricultural Policy and the Re-invention of the Rural in the European Community." Sociologia Ruralis 40: 30-52, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9523.00130. Go to original source...
  17. Gregory, D. 2009. "Space." Pp. 707-710 in D. Gregory, R. Johnston, G. Pratt, M. Watts, S. Whatmore (eds.). The Dictionary of Human Geography. Chichester: Blackwell.
  18. Halfacree, K. 1993. "Locality and Social Representation: Space, Discourse and Alternative Definitions of the Rural." Journal of Rural Studies 9: 23-37, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0743-0167(93)90003-3. Go to original source...
  19. Halfacree, K. 1995. "Talking About Rurality: Social Representations of the Rural as Expressed by Residents of Six English Parishes." Journal of Rural Studies 11: 1-20, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0743-0167(94)00039-C. Go to original source...
  20. Halfacree, K. 2004. "Rethinking Rurality." Pp. 285-304 in T. Champion, H. Graeme (eds.). New Forms of Urbanization: Beyond the Urban-rural Dichotomy. Aldershot: Ashgate. Go to original source...
  21. Halfacree, K. 2006. "Rural Space: Constructing a Three-fold Architecture." Pp. 44-62 in P. Cloke, P. Marsden, P. Mooney (eds.). Handbook of Rural Studies. London: SAGE, http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781848608016.n4. Go to original source...
  22. Halfacree, K. 2007. "Trial by Space for a 'Radical Rural': Introducing Alternative Localities, Representations and Lives." Journal of Rural Studies 23: 125-141, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2006.10.002. Go to original source...
  23. Harris, J. (ed.). 2001. Tönnies: Community and Civil Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  24. Harvey, D. 2006. "Space as a Keyword." Pp. 270-293 in N. Castree, D. Gregory (eds.). David Harvey: A Critical Reader. Malden: Blackwell Publishing, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470773581.ch14. Go to original source...
  25. Harvey, D. (1973) 2009. Social Justice and the City. Athens: The University of Georgia Press.
  26. Hoggart, K. 1990. "Let's Do Away with Rural." Journal of Rural Studies 6: 245-257, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0743-0167(90)90079-N. Go to original source...
  27. Holt-Jensen, A. 2009. Geography, History and Concepts: a Student's Guide. London: SAGE.
  28. Hruška, V. 2013. Diferenciace venkovského prostoru na příkladu Moravskoslezského kraje. Disertační práce. Brno: Masarykova univerzita.
  29. Hudečková, H. 1995. "Privatizace v zemědělství a obnova venkova." Sociologický časopis 31: 449-462. Go to original source...
  30. Jones, O. 1995. "Lay Discourses of the Rural: Developments and Implications for Rural Studies." Journal of Rural Studies 11: 35-49, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0743-0167(94)00057-G. Go to original source...
  31. Kaplan, K. 2012. Proměny české společnosti, 1948-1960: Část druhá: venkov. Praha: Ústav pro soudobé dějiny AV ČR.
  32. Kurtz, M., V. Craig. 2009. "Constructing Rural Geographies in Publication." ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies [online] 8 (2) [cit. 9. 3. 2014]. Dostupné z: http://www.acme-journal.org/vol8/Kurtz&Craig09.pdf.
  33. Lèfebvre, H. (1974) 1991. The Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwell.
  34. Mackinnon, D., A. Cumbers. 2007. An Introduction to Economic Geography: Globalization, Uneven Development and Place. Harlow: Pearson.
  35. Majerová, V. 2005. Teoretické přístupy k rozvoji venkova. Pp. 9-18 in V. Majerová (ed.). Český venkov 2005 - Rozvoj venkovské společnosti. Praha: ČZU, Provozně ekonomická fakulta, CREDIT.
  36. Matthews, H., M. Taylor, K. Sherwood, F. Tucker, M. Limb. 2000. "Growing-up in the Countryside: Children and the Rural Idyll." Journal of Rural Studies 16: 141-153, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0743-0167(99)00059-5. Go to original source...
  37. Ministerstvo pro místní rozvoj ČR. 2006. Strategie regionálního rozvoje České republiky na roky 2007-2013. Praha: Ministerstvo pro místní rozvoj ČR.
  38. Mormont, M. 1990. "Who is Rural? Or, How to Be Rural: Towards a Sociology of the Rural." Pp. 21-44 in T. Marsden, P. Lowe, S. Whatmore (eds.). Rural Restructuring: Global Processes and their Responses. London: Fulton.
  39. Moseley, M. 1980. "Rural Development and its Relevance to the Inner City Debate." Inner Cities Working Party Paper. London: Social Science Research Council.
  40. Murdoch, J., T. Marsden. 1994. Reconstituting Rurality: Class, Community, and Power in the Development Process. London: UCL Press.
  41. Murdoch, J., A. Pratt. 1993. "Rural Studies: Modernism, Postmodernism and the 'Post-rural'." Journal of Rural Studies 9: 411-427, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0743-0167(93)90053-M. Go to original source...
  42. Panelli, R. 2006. "Rural Society." Pp. 63-90 in P. Cloke, P. Marsden, P. Mooney (eds.). Handbook of Rural Studies. London: SAGE, http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781848608016.n5. Go to original source...
  43. Peet, R., N. Thrift. 1989. "Political Economy and Human Geography." Pp. 3-29 in R. Peet, N. Thrift (eds.). New Models in Geography. Vol. 2. London: Unwin Hyman, http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203400531_chapter_1. Go to original source...
  44. Perlín, R. 1999. "Venkov, typologie venkovského prosoru." Pp. 87-104 in F. Malý, B. Viktoriová (eds.). Česká etnoekologie. Praha: Cargo Publishers.
  45. Phillips, M., R. Fish, J. Agg. 2001. "Putting Together Ruralities: Towards a Symbolic Analysis of Rurality in the British Mass Media." Journal of Rural Studies 17: 1-27, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0743-0167(00)00015-2. Go to original source...
  46. Slepička, A. 1989. Přeměny venkova: venkov našeho věku. Praha: Svoboda.
  47. Valentine, G. 1997. "A Safe Place to Grow Up? Parenting, Perceptions of Children's Safety and the Rural Idyll." Journal of Rural Studies 13: 137-148, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0743-0167(97)83094-X. Go to original source...
  48. Vobecká, J. 2009. "Dojížďkový přístup k vymezení městského, příměstského a venkovského obyvatelstva v České republice." Demografie [online] 50 (1) [cit. 28. 1. 2013]. Dostupné z: http://www.soc.cas.cz/articles/cz/5/4561/VOBECKA-J.-2009.-8222-Dojizdkovy-pristup-k-vymezeni-mestskeho-primestskehoa-venkovskeho-obyvatelstva-v-Ceske-republice.-8220-Demografie-50-1-14-23.html.
  49. Walker, G. 2002. "Contemporary Clerical Constructions of a Spiritual Rural Idyll." Sociologia Ruralis 42: 131-142, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9523.00206. Go to original source...
  50. Wardenga, U. 2002. "Räume der Geographie - zu Raumbegriffen im Geographieunterricht." Geographie heute 23 (200): 8-11.
  51. Wirth, L. 1938. "Urbanism as a Way of Life." The American Journal of Sociology 44 (1): 1-24, http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/217913. Go to original source...
  52. Woods, M. 2005. Rural Geography: Processes, Responses and Experiences in Rural Restructuring. London: SAGE.
  53. Woods, M. 2009. "Rural Geography." Pp. 429-441 in R. Kitchin, N. Thrift (eds.). International Encyclopedia of Human Geography. Amsterdam: Elsevier, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-008044910-4.00900-7. Go to original source...
  54. Woods, M. 2010. "Performing Rurality and Practising Rural Geography." Progress in Human Geography 34: 835-846, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0309132509357356. Go to original source...
  55. Woods, M. 2011. Rural. London: Routledge. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.